| Domain | Deadline | Who Is Personally Liable | What Good Looks Like | First 30 Days Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI Literacy |
Live Feb 2025
Article 4 EU AI Act
|
CEO / PCF 14 Head of Compliance | Documented, role specific training programme. Evidence of staff competency by AI system type. | Conduct AI inventory. Identify every tool staff use that meets the EU AI Act definition. |
| Prohibited AI Practices |
Live Feb 2025
Article 5 EU AI Act
|
Board / CEO | Confirmed absence of Article 5 prohibited practices. Documented and board signed off. | Review all AI tools against Article 5 prohibited list. Document findings and obtain board sign off. |
| Consumer Protection |
24 Mar 2026
Consumer Protection Code 2025 + CBI Guidance on Securing Good Consumer Outcomes
|
Relevant PCF Holder (e.g., PCF-14, PCF-8, PCF-45) | Auditable human in the loop protocols for automated lending or advice decisions. Aligned to CBI Guidance on Securing Good Consumer Outcomes. The CBI cares less about your policy and more about the consumer outcome. | Map every customer facing AI touchpoint. Confirm human override and documented consumer outcome exists at each AI decision point. |
| Explainability |
24 Mar 2026
EU AI Act + Consumer Protection Code 2025
|
Relevant PCF Holder (e.g., PCF-14, PCF-8, PCF-45) | Documentation answering three questions for every AI decision: what data was used, how it was weighted, why that outcome. This documentation must be pre-emptive. It must exist before the decision is made. Not when the regulator asks. | Implement Explainability Documentation Framework. Build decision template library by use case. Most firms are failing this test right now. |
| High Risk AI |
Aug 2026
EU AI Act Annex III
|
Board / CRO | AI risk classification register. Early engagement with the CBI Innovation Hub before deploying any Annex III system. | Classify all AI systems against Annex III criteria. Flag high risk systems to board now. |
| Individual Accountability |
Live Now
IAF / SEAR (see Credit Union note)
|
Relevant PCF Holder personally. Note: SEAR (Duty of Responsibility) currently applies to Banks, Insurers and Investment Firms only. For Wealth Managers and Credit Unions, liability stems from the Administrative Sanctions Procedure (ASP) and IAF Conduct Standards. | AI governance explicitly mapped in Management Responsibility Map. For SEAR in scope firms: AI governance as a Prescribed Responsibility in the Statement of Responsibilities (SoR). | Map AI accountability to named PCF Holders in MRM. Confirm SEAR scope with legal counsel. All firms: review Conduct Standards obligations regardless of SEAR status. |
| Data Provenance |
Live Now
GDPR + EU AI Act
|
DPO / CRO | Data Provenance Register covering all AI training data sources, data flows and lineage. | Audit all AI training data sources. Establish provenance register. Identify third party data dependencies. |
| Operational Resilience |
Enforced / Live
DORA — fully enforced since 17 January 2025
|
Board / CTO | AI service providers classified as Critical Third Party Providers where applicable under DORA. ICT risk register reflects all AI system dependencies. | Verify AI ICT Risk is included in the 2026 Digital Operational Resilience Strategy. Not next year. Now. |